log in
Print | Back

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Nicholas A. Danella

Nicholas A. Danella



  • Appellate
  • Complex Business Litigation
  • Litigation

WSG Practice Industries



Nick Danella concentrates his practice on high-stakes and appellate litigation throughout the federal and state court systems. In particular, he focuses on appeals, critical motions, and working as the “appellate lawyer at trial.”

Recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a “noted appellate litigator,” Nick has handled dozens of federal and state court appeals nationwide, most recently in the Eleventh, Sixth, Fourth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, Maine, and Alabama. Just in the past year, Nick has worked on appellate matters that have resulted in two major victories: the reversal of a trial judge’s interpretation of a statutory notice requirement with broad-ranging impact for the financial services industry (in a case that Nick argued orally); and the post-trial reduction of a punitive damages award from $30 million to $300,000 in a medical malpractice case.

In addition, Nick regularly works as the “appellate lawyer at trial” (and pre-trial), with responsibility for legal strategy and briefing, including dispositive motions, Daubert/Frye motions, motions in limine, motions for judgment as a matter of law, nonsuit, and directed verdict, and other in-trial motions and bench briefs. He also handles post-trial proceedings in trial courts, including motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, new trial, and remittitur. For example, Nick was part of a defense trial team that was engaged in two month-long product liability trials in Pennsylvania state court, each of which resulted in a jury verdict for the defense. He also was part of a defense trial team that was engaged in a two-month False Claims Act trial against the U.S. Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, which resulted in judgment as a matter of law for the defense.

Substantively, Nick has handled a broad spectrum of litigation matters, including cases involving healthcare, the False Claims Act, contract disputes, and commercial issues. He also has experience in administrative proceedings, medical malpractice, antitrust and competition, statutory interpretation, federal and state constitutional issues, class actions, arbitration, tax, admiralty, bankruptcy, sports law, and product liability. Further, he has provided clients with strategic advice regarding a wide range of business practices.

Nick was named to the “40 & Under Hot List” by Benchmark Litigation and was named one of the “Top 40 Under 40” by the Birmingham Business Journal. He was also listed as a “Rising Star” in Appellate by Mid-South Super Lawyers.

Nick joined Bradley after several years of litigation experience at Skadden Arps in New York and Los Angeles. He also served as a law clerk on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Bar Admissions

  • Alabama, 2015
  • Tennessee, 2014
  • New York, 2013
  • California, 2007

Court Admissions
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
  • United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
  • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
  • United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • United States District Court, Central District of California
  • United States District Court, Northern District of California


  • University of Notre Dame Law School, J.D., 2006, summa cum laude; Executive Issue Editor, Notre Dame Law Review
  • Harvard University, A.B., 2001, cum laude
Areas of Practice

Appellate | Complex Business Litigation | Litigation


Justices Should Weigh In On FCA Objective Falsity Standard
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, February 2021

In its conference on Feb. 19, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to consider two pending petitions for certiorari that could resolve a critical but deeply disputed issue that impacts both the False Claims Act and health care law. The cert petitions in those cases — U.S. v. Care Alternatives,[1] and Winter v...


Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 

The Declassified blog offers commentary and insights on the latest class action suits, significant class action opinions, relevant changes to laws and rules, and important class action trends. Declassified covers topics ranging from significant Supreme Court and appellate court decisions regarding...

Patent 213
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 

Patent law, like most things in life, is subject to change. Changes to patent laws not only impact investment in your existing IP, but directly shape strategies to protect your freedom to operate. The Patent 213 blog provides up-to-date, insightful analysis of the evolution in the written...

The Law of Order
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 

Bradley’s The Law of Order blog serves as a general parliamentary procedure resource, providing information about creation and revision of governing documents (constitutions, bylaws, or rules), application of Robert’s Rules of Order and other procedural authorities in a variety of contexts (such as...

WSG's members are independent firms and are not affiliated in the joint practice of professional services. Each member exercises its own individual judgments on all client matters.

HOME | SITE MAP | GLANCE | PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER |  © World Services Group, 2021