
Paul D. Ackerman
Partner
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
New York, U.S.A.
tel: +1 212 850 2858
Send an Email
Local Time: Sun. 19:05
Articles
- Samsung v. Apple – The Supreme Court Limits Damages in Design Patent Cases
- USPTO Updates Examination Guidelines for Patent Eligible Subject Matter
- Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., et al.
- Supreme Court Gives Deference to USPTO in Post Grant Proceedings
- Point of Novelty Blog (pointofnovelty.blogspot.com)
- Federal Circuit Expands the Definition of Direct Infringement
- The Federal Circuit Recognizes a Limited Patent Agent Privilege
- Through the Rabbit-Hole: Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International: Supreme Court Holds “Merely Requiring Generic Computer Implementation” Cannot Transform an “Abstract Idea into a Patent-Eligible Invention”
- Factual Questions May Preclude Early Resolution of Invalidity under Section 101
- Federal Trade Secrets Law Is Now a Reality, Soulier Strategic Lawyering Newsletter
- Supreme Court Alters Appellate Standard of Review for Claim Construction in Patent Cases
- USPTO Issues New Rules for Patent Office Trials; Republished by IP Litigator (Wolters Kluwer)
- Federal Trade Secrets Law Is Now a Reality
- Nautilus v. Biosig
- Mandated Simplification of Patent Litigation - Judicial Trends and a new Model Order
- USPTO Issues New Rules for Patent Office Trials, Republished by IP Litigator (Wolters Kluwer)
- An Overview of Trade Secrets Law in the United States, NYSBA International Law Practicum, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 35-41
© Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, 2019