AML/CFT Identity Verification during COVID-19 Lockdown
Related Articles in
Latest Firm's Press
On Thursday 26 March 2020, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Financial Markets Authority and Department of Internal Affairs (together, the AML/CFT Supervisors) jointly released urgent guidance on how to comply with the verification requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT Act) while New Zealand is subject to the COVID-19 Alert Levels and, in particular, the current national lockdown of Level 4 (COVID-19 Verification Guidance).
Who needs to read it? Why?
The COVID-19 Verification Guidance will be relevant to all reporting entities that remain operating and anticipate needing to conduct any type of customer due diligence (CDD) while the COVID-19 Alert Levels are in effect. It will also be of interest to reporting entities going forward when they encounter situations impeding usual verification practices.
What does it cover?
As part of initial or subsequent CDD, a reporting entity must collect prescribed information about their customers, as well as any beneficial owners, or persons acting on behalf, of their customers. The precise nature of this information will depend on whether the CDD is simplified, standard or enhanced in nature. In addition to obtaining this information, the reporting entity must also “take reasonable steps” to verify that it is correct, on the basis of “documents, data, or information issued by a reliable and independent source”.
The impetus for the COVID-19 Verification Guidance is that the COVID-19 Alert Levels will necessarily change how New Zealand reporting entities conduct their business, especially during the current national lockdown at Level 4 where non-essential services can only operate remotely.
In the COVID-19 Verification Guidance, the AML/CFT Supervisors are not suggesting anything new, but are instead trying to draw attention to existing mechanisms within the regime that could assist in carrying out CDD while interactions with customers are so limited. Specifically, these are:
Underlying this all is an emphasis on the continuing need for vigilance even in these abnormal times. The usual risks remain, and in addition there may be those seeking to capitalise on the disruption in an attempt to get away with what they otherwise wouldn’t be able to.
Given the significant consequences of noncompliance with AML/CFT obligations, it was important to proactively make clear to reporting entities that they are still expected to fulfil their usual requirements.
At the same time, although the AML/CFT Supervisors are not making concessions around obligations during this period, this guidance provides a helpful reminder that the regime already contains options for reporting entities to carry out verification of identity information in nonstandard ways where that would be appropriate. As well as assisting them during these particular circumstances, a greater awareness of these options may allow reporting entities to carry out identity verification more efficiently going forward, in other situations where standard processes are not feasible.
If you have any questions in relation to your business’s AML/CFT obligations, or the regime more generally, please contact one of our experts.
Link to article
Related Articles in
- Cambodia: Use of Khmer Language and Currency in Financials and Onsite Inspections
- Chilean Executive Presents “FinTech Law” Bill
- The Dramatic Increase in UK Megadeals
- Corporate Restructuring Strategies for the Post-Pandemic Recovery
Latest Firm's Press
- MinterEllisonRuddWatts advises on Allegro Funds’ acquisition of Toll Global Express
- Stacey Shortall honoured as distinguished alumni by Victoria University of Wellington
- US global investment firm KKR set to acquire leading New Zealand transport company, Ritchies Transport
WSG Member: Please login to add your comment.