Anne Miles Golson assists clients across the healthcare industry with a wide range of regulatory, operational, and litigation matters. Her practice focuses on representing providers in payment disputes with Medicare and Medicaid managed care organizations through contractual dispute resolution processes, administrative appeals, arbitration, and in state and federal courts. In addition to her experience with managed care appeals, she uses her substantive healthcare experience to assist clients with the litigation of all other healthcare-related issues. Anne Miles has experience with Medicare appeals, nationwide class actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex litigation.

Anne Miles also uses her unique corporate and litigation experience to maintain an active pro bono practice:

• She is involved in Bradley’s Black-Owned Small Business and Nonprofit Clinic, through which she provides business-oriented legal services to local minority-owned small businesses.
• She has assisted in a range of pro bono litigation matters, including assisting on petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court and Alabama Supreme Court and representing capital clients through state post-conviction proceedings.
• She helped to represent the Innocence Project as amicus curiae in the Arkansas Supreme Court, which overturned the denial of DNA testing of crime scene evidence in the “West Memphis Three” case. The West Memphis Three — Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley — were originally convicted of the 1993 murders of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis, Arkansas. Their convictions were overturned on appeal after DNA testing excluded the three then-teenagers from the crime-scene evidence that was tested. They entered Alford pleas in 2011 to avoid retrial and secure their release. Echols later sought additional DNA testing with a newer, more precise method in an effort to fully exonerate the three men and identify the true killers. Although an Arkansas circuit court denied his petition on the grounds that Echols is no longer in custody, the Arkansas Supreme Court reversed in April 2024, agreeing with Echols’s and the Innocence Project’s arguments that the plain text of the Arkansas statute allowing for post-conviction DNA testing does not require that an individual be incarcerated to pursue relief. You can read about the decision here.

Bar Admissions

• Alabama, 2020

Education

• University of Alabama School of Law, J.D., 2020, summa cum laude; Junior Editor, Alabama Law Review; Order of the Barristers; Order of the Coif; Dean M. Leigh Harrison Award; Hugo L. Black Scholar Award; Bench & Bar Legal Honor Society; Campbell Moot Court Board Member; Elections Committee Co-Chair, Student Bar Association
• University of Alabama, B.A., English, 2015, Blount Scholars Program