log in
Print | Back

Haynes and Boone

Edward M. Lebow

Edward M. Lebow

Counsel

Expertise

  • Chemical
  • Cuba

WSG Practice Industries

Activity

Haynes and Boone
D.C., U.S.A.

WSG Leadership

Patent Law Workshop Group
Member
ABA Group
Member
Profile
Ed Lebow has been skillfully representing clients in international trade cases for more than 30 years. They often comment that his approach is exceptionally business-oriented, cost-effective and targeted. Through years of providing insightful counsel to both domestic and foreign companies, Ed has developed a broad and comprehensive perspective, which he brings to his clients' business needs. Ed is AV Peer Review Rated Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory.

Ed obtains relief for U.S. industries injured by dumped or subsidized imports and successfully defends foreign companies against such actions. He is especially adept in advising clients on how to comply with U.S. trade laws and avoid costly legal proceedings. Ed regularly deals with OFAC sanctions, export controls, NAFTA, anti-bribery issues under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and customs matters. Ed has guided both foreign buyers and domestic sellers of companies with sensitive technologies through the inter-agency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Ed has also represented both U.S. and foreign clients before Congress.

Prior to private practice, Ed served as an Assistant General Counsel of the U.S. International Trade Commission, focusing on antidumping, countervailing duty and Section 337 cases. Ed also headed the ITC's Section 337 staff office. Drawing on this experience, Ed is well-versed in handling Section 337 proceedings involving patent infringement and other unfair trade practices.

Ed's experience covers a broad range of industries and regions. He has successfully represented clients in the chemicals, electronics, metals and other industries. In recent years, Ed's practice has expanded to include advising energy industry clients on the permitting of exports from the United States of liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil and electricity. Ed's clients come from all corners of the globe, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, Korea, China, Thailand, Singapore, India, Germany and the United Kingdom.

Ed is particularly proud of his connections with Japan. Ed has lived in Japan and speaks Japanese, and he routinely advises clients on both the legal and cultural aspects of doing business in Japan. Ed was formerly Co-chair and Senior Advisor to the Asia-Pacific Committee of the American Bar Association's Section of International Law.

Outside of his work on trade cases, Ed devotes considerable time to assisting refugee victims of violence and abuse. Ed won asylum for a Cameroonian woman who had been imprisoned and tortured because of her participation in the democratic opposition to that country's dictatorial regime.

Bar Admissions

District of Columbia
Massachusetts
New York

Education

J.D., Harvard Law School
B.A., Harvard University, with honors
Areas of Practice

Chemical | Cuba

Professional Career

Significant Accomplishments

Won several import relief cases for major U.S. chemical companies and producers of industrial gases, with high penalty duties imposed on dumped and subsidized imports from China and other countries.

Successfully defended Indian, Japanese, Korean and Mexican manufacturers of numerous types of products, such as textiles, steel, high strength plastics, heavy electric equipment, intricate machinery and consumer electronics in U.S. antidumping, countervailing duty and Section 337 proceedings.

Administered a cost-effective export licensing program for a U.S. exporter of high technology controls for aircraft and armored vehicles.

Defended a U.S. subsidiary of a Japanese machine tool manufacturer in a defense criminal investigative service inquiry into allegations of false claims under the Buy America Act.

Prepared an export compliance program for a U.S. manufacturer of classified defense electronics.

Guided a Japanese manufacturer of retail systems equipment in achieving a highly desirable outcome of a U.S. Customs Service transfer pricing audit.

Achieved complete victory for a Japanese manufacturer of printers before the American Arbitration Association against a $40 million claim for allegedly defective products.

Counsels a multinational trade association and a major U.S. consulting company with international operations on U.S. sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Articles

Is There a Law in China Similar to the US Defense Production Act?
Haynes and Boone, May 2020

Although there is no law or regulation in the People’s Republic of China that explicitly parallels the US Defense Production Act of 1950 (“DPA”), as an economy with many remaining elements of state control, there are ample administrative measures, regulations and judicial precedents in China allowing the government to overrule outstanding production plans and contracts by mandating, controlling, allocating and prioritizing production of critical supplies...

Bulk-Power System Executive Order: Implications for Current Projects, Future Projects, and NERC Compliance
Haynes and Boone, May 2020

On May 1, 2020, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order declaring a national emergency with respect to threats to the U.S. bulk-power system posed by the unrestricted supply of bulk power equipment by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a foreign adversary, presumably including China, a source for many of the components impacted by the Executive Order...

The Trump Administration Again Expands Its Use of the Defense Production Act to Combat the Coronavirus Pandemic
Haynes and Boone, April 2020

On April 2, President Trump moved to use the Defense Production Act of 1950 (“DPA”) to expand the authority of the Department of Homeland Security to intervene in the private sector to order and prioritize production of supplies and equipment needed to address the coronavirus pandemic...

WSG's members are independent firms and are not affiliated in the joint practice of professional services. Each member exercises its own individual judgments on all client matters.

HOME | SITE MAP | GLANCE | PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER |  © World Services Group, 2022